The curve of the trajectory of the ball is a negatively parabolic curve because the y-component starts with a positive velocity, but gradually decreasing due to an acceleration of -9.8m/s.
Also, the distance between each point's x-component is approximately equal because because (x) has a acceleration of 0.
In other words, the x-component of velocity is the constant, thus the change in (x) is the same throughout the whole experiment.
The graph for position(x) is linear. This suggests that the velocity of (x) is constant, not experiencing any acceleration.
The velocity(x) vs. time graph strangely shows a negatively linear model. The graph should be a horizontal line, for there should've been zero change in velocity, zero accleration. The strange occurance may be due to human error, for the person plotting the data may not have been accurately tracing the object's projectile path.
Like the trajectory graph, the position(y) vs. time graph is also negatively parabolic. This hints at the fact that the trajectory graph's parabolic quality originates from the parabolic quality of its y-component. Also, it's parabolic nature shows a negative change in velocity, a negative acceleration.
The graph of velocity(y) vs. time shows a negatively linear curve, thus there is a negative acceleration . The graph shows that the object is slowing down in one direction, then changes direction when the plot crosses the x-axis and begins speeding up.
The curve of the trajectory of the ball is a negatively parabolic curve because the y-component starts with a positive velocity, but gradually decreasing due to an acceleration of -9.8m/s.
Also, the distance between each point's x-component is approximately equal because because (x) has a acceleration of 0.
In other words, the x-component of velocity is the constant, thus the change in (x) is the same throughout the whole experiment.
The graph for position(x) is linear. This suggests that the velocity of (x) is constant, not experiencing any acceleration.
The velocity(x) vs. time graph strangely shows a negatively linear model. The graph should be a horizontal line, for there should've been zero change in velocity, zero accleration. The strange occurance may be due to human error, for the person plotting the data may not have been accurately tracing the object's projectile path.
Like the trajectory graph, the position(y) vs. time graph is also negatively parabolic. This hints at the fact that the trajectory graph's parabolic quality originates from the parabolic quality of its y-component. Also, it's parabolic nature shows a negative change in velocity, a negative acceleration.
The graph of velocity(y) vs. time shows a negatively linear curve, thus there is a negative acceleration . The graph shows that the object is slowing down in one direction, then changes direction when the plot crosses the x-axis and begins speeding up.